Page 35 - Revista Anual - Nº19

Bondurant RH. 2005. Venereal diseases of cattle: Natural history, Clin Microbiol, 44 (3): 938-945. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.938-945.2006
diagnosis, and the role of vaccines in their control. Vet Clin North Michi AN, Favetto PH, Kastelic J, Cobo ER. 2016. A review of se-
Am Food Anim Pract, 21:383–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2005.03.002 xually transmitted bovine trichomoniasis and campylobacteriosis af-
Chaban B, Guerra AG, Hendrick SH, Waldner CL, Hill JE. 2013. Iso- fecting cattle reproductive health. Theriogenology, 85: 781-791. doi:
lation rates of Campylobacter fetus subsp venerealis from bovine pre- 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.10.037
putial samples via passive filtration on nonselective medium versus Monke DR: 1998, Risk analysis: CSS testing protocol for trichomonia-
selective medium, with and without transport medium. Am J Vet Res, sis. Proc 17th Tech Conf Artificial Insemination & Reprod. pp. 37-42.
74(8):1066-9. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.74.8.1066 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia, MO.
Clark BL. 1971. Review of bovine vibriosis. Aust. Vet. J., 47:103-107. Mshelia GD, Amin JD, Woldehiwet Z, Murray, RD, Egwu GO.
Cobo ER, Corbeil LB, BonDurant RH. 2011. Immunity to infections 2010. Epidemiology of bovine venereal campylobacteriosis: Geo-
in the lower genital tract of bulls. J Repro Immunol. 89: 55–61. doi: graphic distribution and recent advances in molecular diagnostic
10.1016/j.jri.2011.02.002 techniques. Reprod Dom Anim, 45: e221-220. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-
Corbeil LB, Campero CM, Rhyan JC, BonDurant RH. 2003. Vaccines 0531.2009.01546.x
against sexually transmitted diseases. Reprod Biol Endocrinol,1: 118. OIE. 2017. OIE Terrestrial Manual: chapter 2.4.4 Bovine genital
doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-118 campylobacteriosis. Paris: Office Internacional des Épizootis. Dispo-
Corbeil LB, Schuring GD, Duncan JR, Corbeil RR, Winter AJ. 1974. nível em: http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/
Immunoglobulin classes and biological functions of Campylobacter tahm/2.04.04_BGC.pdf
(Vibrio) fetus antibodies in serum and cervicovaginal mucus. Infect OIE. 2016. Terrestrial animal health code - Chapter 11.3. Bovine
Immun, 10: 422-429. genital campylobacteriosis. Paris: Office International des épizootis.
Cortese VS. 2002. Bovine reproductive disease vaccines. In: Smith Disponível em: http://www.oie.int/international-standard-setting/ter-
BP, editor. Large animal internal medicine. 3rd ed., St. Louis: Mosby; restrial-code/access-online/
p. 1421–3. OIE 2009. Bovine genital campylobacteriosis and Trichomonosis.
Dekeyser PJ. Bovine genital campylobacteriosis. 1986. In: Morrow World Organization for Animal Health. Disponível em: http://www.oie.
DA, editor. Current therapy in theriogenology. 2nd ed., PA, Philadel- int/wahis/public.php?page=disease_timelines.
phia: W.B. Saunders Company; p. 263–6. On SLW e Harrington CS. 2001. Evaluation of numerical analysis of
Duarte A, Sousa R, Matos M. Tavares L, Lopes da Costa L. Detecção PFGE-DNA profiles for differentiating Campylobacter fetus subspe-
de Campylobacter fetus venerealis, o agente da Campilobacteriose cies by comparison with phenotypic, PCR and 16s rDNA sequencing
Genital Bovina, em Portugal. VI Congresso da SPCV, 3-5 de Abril methods. J. Appl. Microbiol., 90, 285–293.
2014, INIAV, Oeiras. Ramamurthy T, Ghosh A, Pazhani GP, Shinoda S. 2014. Current
EFSA e ECDC. 2014. The European union summary report on trends Perspectives on Viable but Non-Culturable (VBNC) Pathogenic Bac-
and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks teria. Front Public Health, 2: 103. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00103
in 2012. EFSA Journal, 12: 3547. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3547. Sahin O, Yaeger M, Wu Z, Zhang Q. 2017. Campylobacter-asso-
Florent, A. 1959. Les deux vibrioses génitales: la vibriose due à V. ciated diseases in animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci, 5: 21-42. doi:
fetus venerealis et la vibriose d’origine intestinale due à V. fetus intes- 10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022826.
tinalis. Meded Veeartsenijsch Rijksuniv Gent.,3: 1-60. Sahin O, Fitzgerald C, Stroika S, Zhao S, Sippy RJ, Kwan P, et al.
García-Guerra A, Waldner CL, Pellegrino A, Macdonald N, Chaban, 2012. Molecular evidence for zoonotic transmission of an emergent,
B, Hill JE, Hendrick SH. 2016. Effect of sample pooling and transport highly pathogenic Campylobacter jejuni clone in the United States. J
conditions on the clinical sensitivity of a real-time polymerase chain Clin Microbiol, 50(3):680-687. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06167-11.
reaction assay for Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis in preputial Schulze F, Bagon A, Müller W, Hotzel H. 2006. Identification of Cam-
samples from bulls. Can J Vet Res, 80 (1), 32-39. pylobacter fetus subspecies by phenotypic differentiation and PCR. J
Gölz G, Rosner B, Hofreuter D, Josenhans C, Kreienbrock L, Löwens- Clin Microbiol,44 (6):2019-2024. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02566-05
tein A, et al. 2014. Relevance of Campylobacter to public health-the Schutte. 1969. Some aspects of Vibrio fetus infection in bulls. Thesis,
need for a One Health approach. Int J Med Microbiol, 304(7):817- University of Ghent, Belgium.
823. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.08.015. Spence RP, Bruce IR, McFadden AM, Hill FI, Tisdall D, Humphrey S,
Graaf-van Bloois LVD, Miller WG, Yee E, Gorkiewicz G, Forbes KJ, et al. 2011. Cross-reaction of a Campylobacter fetus subspecies ve-
Zomer AL, et al. 2016. Campylobacter fetus Subspecies contain con- nerealis real-time PCR. Vet Rec, 168 (5): 131. doi: 10.1136/vr.c5264.
served type IV secretion systems on multiple genomic islands and Thompson SA, Blaser MJ. 2000. Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fe-
plasmids. PloS one. 11(4): 1-15. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152832 tus infections. In Campylobacter (I. Nachamkin & M.J. Blaser, eds),
Guerra AG, Chaban B, Hill JE, Waldner CL, Hendrick SH. 2014. Cli- 2nd Ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, 321-
nical sensitivity and specificity of a real-time PCR assay for Campy- 347.
lobacter fetus subsp venerealis in preputial samples from bulls. Am J van Bergen MA, Linnane S, van Putten JP, Wagenaar JA. 2005. Glo-
Vet Res, 75(9): 851-860. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.9.851. bal detection and identification of Campylobacter fetus subsp. vene-
Hum S. 2007. Vibriosis of cattle. Disponível em: http://www.dpi.nsw. realis. Rev Sci Tech, 24. 1017-1026.
gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/110043/vibriosis-of-cattle.pdf van der Graaf-van Bloois L, Miller WG, Yee E, Rijnsburger M, Wage-
Humphrey T, O’Brien S, Madsen M. 2007. Campylobacters as zoo- naar JA, Duima B. 2014. Inconsistency of phenotypic and genomic
notic pathogens: A food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol., characteristics of Campylobacter fetus subspecies requires reevalua-
117 (3), 237-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006. tion of current diagnostics. J Clin Microbiol, 52 (12), 4183– 4188.
Irons PC, Schutte AP, Van Der Walt ML, Bishop GC. 2004. Genital doi:10.1128/JCM.01837-14
campylobacteriosis in cattle, in Infectious Diseases of Livestock, 2nd Véron M e Chatelain R. 1973. Taxonomic Study of the Genus Campy-
ed., edited by J.A.W. Coetzer & R.C. Tustin. South Africa: Oxford lobacter Sebald and Véron and Designation of the Neotype Strain for
University Press: 3:1459-1468. the Type Species, Campylobacter fetus (Smith and Taylor) Sebald and
Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodriguex, Mitchell HM, Man SM. 2015. Glo- Véron. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 23: 122-134, doi:10.1099/00207713-
bal epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection. Clin Microbiol Rev, 28 23-2-122
(3); 687-720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15. Wagenaar JA, van Bergen MA, Blaser MJ, Tauxe, RV, Newell DG,
Kienesberger S, Sprenger H, Wolfgruber S, Halwachs B, Thallinger van Putten JP. 2014. Campylobacter fetus infections in humans:
GG, Perez-Perez GI, et al. 2014. Comparative denome analysis of exposure and disease. Clin Infect Dis., 58 (11): 1579-1586. doi:
Campylobacter fetus subspecies revealed horizontally acquired ge- 10.1093/cid/ciu085.
netic elements important for virulence and niche specificity. PLoS Whiley H, van den Akker B, Giglio S, & Bentham R. 2013. The role of
One. 9(1): e85491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085491 environmental reservoirs in human Campylobacteriosis. Int. J. Envi-
Lopes da Costa L e Robalo Silva J. 2016. Beef cow herd reproductive ron. Res. Public Health, 10: 5886-5907. doi:10.3390/ijerph10115886.
performance in the extensive Mediterranean scenario. Reproduction WHO. 2017. Campylobacter: fact sheet. Disponível em: http://www.
in Domestic Animals, 51(S2):50. who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs255/en/
McFadyean, J., and S. Stockman. 1913. Report of the Departmental WHO. 2013. The global view of campylobacteriosis – report of an
Committee Appointed by the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries to expert consultation. Geneva: WHO. Disponível em: http://apps.who.
Enquire into Epizootic Abortion. Part III: Abortion in Sheep. HMSO. int/iris/bitstream/10665/80751/1/9789241564601_eng.pdf?ua=1
London, UK. Wieczorek K e Osek J. 2013. Antimicrobial resistance mecha-
McMillen L, Fordyce G, Doogan VJ, Lew AE. 2006. Comparision of nisms among Campylobacter. Biomed Res Int, 340605. doi:
culture and a novel 5’ Taq nuclease assay for direct detection of Cam- 10.1155/2013/340605.
pylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis in clinical specimens from cattle. J Novembro 2017

Revista Portuguesa de Buiatria 33